top of page

Agile vs. Waterfall: Comparing Success Rates in Project Management 

In project management, methodologies matter. The ways teams approach, organize, and complete projects can spell the difference between success and failure. Two dominant paradigms in this field are the Traditional (Waterfall) and Agile methodologies. But which one boasts a better track record? 


A Glimpse into the Numbers 

According to a report from the Standish Group's Chaos Report (2020), there is a striking difference in the success rates of projects executed under these methodologies from 2013-2020. 

Traditional (Waterfall) Success Rate: 

  • Successful: 13% 

  • Challenged: 28% 

  • Failed: 59% 

Agile Projects Success Rate: 

  • Successful: 42% 

  • Challenged: 47% 

  • Failed: 11% 

Decoding the Results of Agile and Waterfall 

  1. Higher Success with Agile: Agile projects, on average, have a 42% success rate. In contrast, Waterfall projects lag significantly behind at 13%. This notable difference underscores Agile's adaptability and responsiveness to changes. 

  1. Fewer Failures in Agile: The number of projects that outright fail is considerably lower in Agile at 11% compared to Waterfall's staggering 59%. Agile's iterative approach, regular feedback loops, and adaptability might be factors contributing to fewer failures. 

  1. Challenges Remain: While Agile has a higher success rate, it's worth noting that 47% of Agile projects face challenges. This highlights that while Agile can provide better outcomes, it's not without its own set of hurdles. 

Why Does Agile Fare Better than Waterfall? 

  • Adaptability: Agile's iterative nature allows teams to pivot based on feedback, ensuring the final product is more in line with stakeholder expectations. 

  • Regular Feedback: Continuous feedback from stakeholders ensures the product is headed in the right direction, reducing the likelihood of last-minute surprises. 

  • Smaller, Manageable Chunks: Agile breaks projects into smaller chunks (sprints), making them easier to manage and control. 

  • Collaborative Approach: Agile encourages frequent communication between team members and stakeholders, fostering a more collaborative environment. 


While no methodology can guarantee success, the data suggests that Agile offers a more favorable outcome compared to traditional methods. However, the best approach always depends on the specific project, team, and organizational needs. As project management continues to evolve, teams need to stay flexible, learn from both successes and failures and continuously strive for improvement. 



Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page